计算机科学2021 · 分享于 Hacker News
Protocol-Aware Recovery for Consensus-Based Storage
探索《Protocol-Aware Recovery for Consensus-Based Storage》的原文与 Hacker News 社区讨论，查看来源并加入阅读清单。
从论文，走向讨论
看看社区如何讨论这个想法。
来自 Hacker News 的原始讨论。不同的视角、疑问，以及值得继续思考的线索。
最多展示 100 条相关讨论。论文可能出现在评论中，并非原帖投稿内容。
在讨论中发现的引用
按 HN 条目顺序展示最近的 50 条引用来源。
Ytodsacerdoti ·
TigerBeetle is a most interesting database
301 赞同222 评论
Ysolarist ·
Typical implementations of payment processing and related security issues
211 赞同57 评论
Yyagizdegirmenci ·
Paxos vs. Raft: Have we reached consensus on distributed consensus?
183 赞同48 评论
Yrbanffy ·
Paxos automatically determined safe and secure
159 赞同68 评论
Ytodsacerdoti ·
A write-ahead log is not a universal part of durability
159 赞同51 评论
Ycarlsverre ·
The disaggregated write-ahead log (2023)
88 赞同13 评论
Ygagejustins ·
Kafka vs. Redpanda Performance – Do the claims add up?
5 赞同1 评论
YBratishkaErik ·
We Put a Distributed Database in the Browser – and Made a Game of It
4 赞同0 评论
Ybfm ·
Protocol-Aware Recovery for Consensus-Based Storage
1 赞同1 评论
Yavinassh ·
Why `fsync()`: Losing unsynced data on a single node leads to global data loss
1 赞同0 评论